What is utopia to a globalist? I have been trying to figure it out.  Searching on Google brought disturbing results. Bing didn’t much better. The closest I could get as a result was Gorbachev’s State Of The World Forum. Something that somewhat morphed into the Clinton Global Initiative. So I am at a bit of a loss of what the endgame would be. Cap and trade? Free and open borders? A cure for AIDS?

We are familiar with the sixties Hippie Utopia. It would be a commune where we would live naturally with the earth. I would think that a Globalist Utopia would be the antithesis of the hippie movement. Globalism is the rule by a corporate world. At least that is my view. If you were part of the corporation, life would be good. Maybe.

Corporations do not necessarily treat their people well. So how would we be in a corporate ruled world? Sure corporations provide services, but you need customers too. Could corporations live in a Gorbachev defined socialist state? They seem mutually exclusive. Also George Soros efforts to expand globalization seem downright baffling to me.

So I am hoping someone can explain what paradise would be like for a globalist.

It is not lost on me that Hillarys collapse occurred at the scene of Americas greatest and most tragic collapse. I am wondering if this the precursor of a dramatic collapse of her campaign.

Hillarys surrogates replaced her on the campaign trail, and immediately suggested that Trump is unelectable because a recent survey showed that sixty percent of Americans believe Donald J Trump is a racist and sexist.

My view is Hillary has spent hundreds of millions of large donations from special interest groups and foreign governments to untruthfully convince the American public that her opponent is a racist and sexist.

It is not working, despite being massively outspent, Donalds support is growing. The lies of Hillary campaign and massive special interest funding are not working. Her support is collapsing. As she has collapsed, in dramatic fashion.

In the globalist world, Donald is a peon. Unworthy of any social standing. However the current corpulent and corrupt regime, held in place by the proletarian guard of our biased media is beginning to collapse in a most dramatic fashion. The wordsmiths are sharpening their words, the opticians are focusing their optics. Soon the bumbling Claudius will be emperor. Life was good under Claudius, hopefully we will have a better successor.

I put some Trump signs in the trunk of the Miata, and proceeded to drive around and put up the signs. I have learned that you can only put the signs up on State roads. So I decided to only put the signs up at the intersections of State roads. Additionally, I would only put the signs up where there were other political signs. I really do not want to offend anyone. I just want to play the game and support the candidate of my choice.

A couple of days later, I drive by and the the Trump sign was gone. This is not unusual for Trump signs. I wonder if I’m wasting Donald Trumps money by putting up signs that disappear. Then I remember why I’m doing this, I am trying to do what is right. My dad and his friends used to remove the the opposition signage. For them the ends justified the means. I applauded his interest and activism, and urged fair play. However removing the opposition signage gave them joy.

I am doing this because of my father, by putting signs up that will be removed will keep the ghosts happy. Of course I disagree, that’s why I will continue to put the signs up.

It is really laughable that people claim Donald J Trump is a racist. New Yorkers are not racist, they would never survive. There are no racist New Yorkers. It also appears to me that the claim that Donald J Trumps supporters are racist is downright ludicrous.

So this gets me to thinking, what has caused people to say such things. Now I think there is plenty of evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is a racist. He has made a number of racist comments as president. I then must conclude, the people that support Barack Obama are also racist. Of course that is an overly broad statement, but this election has brought out an enormous amount of broad and untrue statements. The perceived perception that one’s opponent is racist masks the racism in the perceiver.

Racists are not always white.

Let me get down to the reason Donald wants to be President, and the reason he would be a good one. Three letters, EGO. Donald has built an empire on his name, an empire that he is very proud of. However the empire is built on leases, and leases are a temporary thing. There is a permanence in history of being president. When the time comes to renegotiate the leases, probably after Donald has passed, there will be an advantage of a Presidential legacy.This is why he will be a good president, it will be his legacy he will be most concerned about. He will understand that the people will be the judge.

Hillary is more concerned about power, it is her ideas that are better than any others. It is her mission to conquer and subjugate. It would be her legacy to set the agenda to her views, or more likely the views of the highest bidder. Quid Pro Quo

I don’t believe it’s just the Clinton Foundation that engages in such behavior. I think that it’s historically affected most politicians to varying degrees. I had to chuckle when NPR said it was good to have big money in politics, of course they were referring to super pacs. Their theory was that it gave voice to the individual.

I beg to differ, big money reflects big money interests.

I have always said that people will believe a lie before they believe the truth. It’s because a well crafted lie will say what a person wants to hear, whereas sometimes we do not want to hear the truth.

So I wondered how do reconcile my believe that Donald tells truth, and Hillary is the big liar. Using such logic Hillary should be the big winner. However I believe Donald will be the biggest winner. Something is wrong with my thought process.

Then watching Donald talk about the wall, I realized that Donald Trump was telling the biggest most preposterous lie ever. He was going to make the Mexicans pay for it. Harumph! You just don’t charge your neighbor for your stuff. I had a brief moment when I thought that Donald would charge for his big beautiful door, but that would be completely unworkable. Nope it’s a big lie.

I don’t really have a problem with the wall itself, Robert Frost himself said that walls make for good neighbors. The lie itself is a way to start discussion, or so I think. I am to buy a new car and you are going to pay for it. Fat chance. I’m sure some people believe that Mexico will pay for the wall. In their mind, as long as they do not have to pay for it, it is good. With accounting magic you could probably prove it on paper.

Just for the record, I do not think this is the only time Donald has stretched the truth. However most of his statements are pretty solidly based.

 

Some folks believe Co2 will affect everything in the world, and some folks do not. Unfortunately the discussion has somehow become political. This has the result of degenerating science. I have found that the most ardent believers of global warming do not know the most simple scientific facts about carbon and the atmosphere. When asked they usually ramble off on an obscure discussion that ends up with a story about a glass in the sky. Talk about the Holy Grail.

So the facts. When you burn a gallon of gas, you create eighteen pounds of Co2. At the same time you remove twelve pounds of oxygen from the atmosphere. So you have essentially added six pounds of atmosphere for every gallon of gas. Or simply, turning liquid to gas.

Every year we increase the Co2 in the atmosphere by one part per million, presumably due to mans activity.  So we have increased the thickness of the atmosphere by approximately 333 parts per billion. That make the atmospheric “blanket” slightly thicker. Those are the facts.

Next we the historic coincidence that the Co2 levels in the atmosphere roughly correlate with atmospheric temperature. We really do not know if there is a direct cause and effect relationship. At least I have not seen proof, to me it seems no more than a hypothesis. Myth Busters once took a box of Co2 and with a lamp and a thermometer and compared it to a box of normal atmosphere. The box of one hundred percent Co2 was very slightly warmer than the atmosphere. In reality, if the Co2 in normal atmosphere was increased by one part per million, the result would be immeasurable.

Some things that I do not know, how do the temperature of other planets compare with earth? The actual ability of Co2 to retain heat versus Oxygen?  How much do scientists actually make by affirming the reality of global warming? Are trees really happier with more Co2 in the atmosphere?

Why do the black people on TV seem so angry? I am sure some of them must be mellow. Fifty years of affirmative action cannot be that bad. I would like to see some happy black people! Why don’t the people who control what is on TV put some happy people on?

That’s right, the people that control TV prefer to promote anger.

Hillary has no problem raising money from her billionaire friends and the Saudis. She then uses the money to buy TV time and pay people to promote anger. I am startled that the whole of the Clinton campaign is to promote anger at Donald J Trump and his supporters. From what I understand, she pays people to troll internet forums and attack Trump and his supporters. She pays people to protest his rallies. She pays for attack ads on TV. No, Donald is not perfect. However he is successful, and he has managed debt. So what is precisely the goal of the angry money?

Donald is also angry at times, he however is not angry at Americans. His attacks on Hillary are much less mean spirited than hers on him.

I am hoping that people get tired of the anger.